Findings

Teacher Dropout Rates

Better infrastructure Dropout

Subsidized schools   Dropout


Only 20% of dropouts can be explained by data we have on schools and teachers

Teachers in Schools with + and – Learning

We interviewed teachers and principals in schools with student performance above average (+ deviants) and below average (– deviants) to compare and uncover their practices, behaviors, and strategies.

Differences Between Schools

Positive Deviants Characteristics

+ Deviant schools: smaller, tend to have fewer students & lower student-teacher ratio

+ Deviant schools: teachers with longer tenure as teachers and in the current school

+ Deviant schools: teachers attend school every day

+ Deviant schools: self-reported very high teacher dropout in the past three years

+ Deviant schools: outperform average and – deviants in areas like peer-to-peer learning and professional development.

School infrastructure & quality of food program do not seem to be the performance drivers.

Strategies of Public and Subsidized Schools vs Positive Deviants

Public schools
System strategies
Positive deviants
In school strategies
Subsidized schools
System strategies
Icon of training and professional developmentProfessional developmentDecentralized, teacher-led
NGOs programs reach some
Frequent training
Apolitical
Frequent training in alliance with private universities and NGOs
Mechanisms iconCoping mechanismsReallocation of teachers and local young professionals in lower grades, flexible scheduleLimited flexibility, local young professionals in lower gradesNo flexibility, within school reallocations, hiring and training community members
School managementSchool managementSupervision focuses on reporting on regular attendance and implementationEffective principals, supportive supervision, peer to peer learningEffective principals, supportive supervision, peer to peer learning, teacher recognition
ParentsParental involvementHigh variation, non-monetary support to schoolHigh engagement and responsiveness, primarily non-monetary support to schoolHigh engagement and responsiveness, primarily in kind and monetary support to school